Hcs 320 Week 4 Team Assignment Contract

Introduction/Purpose

 The purpose of this collaborative group experience activity is to implement and reinforce the group communication policy that was outlined in your course syllabus and the learning styles/study skill activity you completed in weeks’ one and two.

 Last, but not least, you will practice using group tools located under Courses & Groups/your group and practice basic communication skills.

 Task

Your group’s task is to create a contract which supports the group communication policy and group rubric, incorporates and supports your different learning styles, and identifies the roles each of you will facilitate within your group.

 Also, you will identify consequences and actions that the group will follow if there is a break down in communication, participation, and workload amongst group members.For this activity you will interact with your group members and the instructor.

 Process and Resources

  1. Reread and reflect upon the group communication policy in the course syllabus.
  2. Review the Group Rubrics below.
  3. Go to http://groups.physics.umn.edu/physed/Research/CGPS/roles.html and read and reflect on different group member roles.
  4. By mid-week, go to Discussions and have an initial discussion with your group members to begin conversation about how you will operationalize the communication policy, what the rubric means, and initial thoughts on team member roles.
  5. Group time management is very important; set guidelines.
  6. Conduct any additional research on effective team/group practices, roles, and contracts and consequences.
  7. Post your completed contract with rationale to the group discussion board by Sunday 10:00 pm. No late work will be accepted.
  8. In addition to the final contract document, each member is required to post an individual reflection of the process, your role, and learning style, and how you feel you will contribute to the group.
  9. I will be monitoring your group’s progress.
  10. For technology help, ask the members of your group for assistance first, and then try the FAQ discussion forum, perhaps another classmate can provide assistance. I will monitor the forum to see if I need to provide additional assistance.
    1.  Feel free to email, call, or go to the Information Commons for help.
    2. The Help button is located at the top of the orange bar.


 Evaluation

This collaborative activity is to be completed by Sunday at 10:00 pm; no late work is accepted so it is important that you communicate with one another early in the week.

    This assignment is worth 50 points; I will use the group rubric as grading criteria.
    Have fun getting to know your group members!
    Complete the Group Contract Activity Evaluation; worth additional points.

 Conclusion

This collaborative activity is designed to help you operationalize the group communication policy, identifying roles and learning styles of team members, and creating a team contract. Because we will work in groups throughout this semester it is important that everyone knows one another’s learning styles, group role, group grading rubric, and the consequences of not working effectively together in a collaborative environment. I will monitor the group forum to ensure we all stay on track.

 Faculty Notes

This collaborative activity can be done in a face-to-face and/or an asynchronous environment. This activity fosters community and social connections, along with each group establishing group rules (contract) for effective collaboration. It also reinforces the importance of learning style, and the group policy as outlined within the syllabus. This collaborative activity is designed to be implemented during the second week of class.

 Online Resources

Group Roles
http://groups.physics.umn.edu/physed/Research/CGPS/roles.html


134647560008/31/201210:00pm

ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 2 Organizational Performance Management Health care facilities, whether large or small in, share in the vision of providing quality services to perspective stakeholders. Compliance with state, federal, and local regulating entities improve employee work performance which leads to higher levels of both risk- and quality-management. JCAHO (The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Organizations) accreditation and measures set by CMS (the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) are the heart of quality measures within the organizations represented in this report. Family Medicine Associates of Millard, Home Instead/ Home Health Care, Cardiology Associates, and Fair Oaks Health Care are all organizations in compliances with JCAHO and CMS. HIPAA (the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act) regulations also ensure quality services by providing patient privacy and confidentiality in each of these organizations (HIPAA, 2011). Additional regulating bodies such as state licensure boards and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are also key players in establishing standards of quality- and risk-management plans for administration, boards, and the staff related to the health care entities connected with these organizations Administration maintains records verifying that current and perspective health care providers within the organization have all necessary professional licensure, certification, and continuing education hours to guarantee accreditation and continued quality care. Similarities and Differences Among Organizations Similarities and differences occur among the four health care organizations (see Appendix A). One notable similarity between Family Medicine Associates of Millard, Home Instead/ Home Health Care, Cardiology Associates, and Fair Oaks Health Care is the staff listed to serve the patients or residents in each organization. Physicians, registered and licensed practical nurses, medical assistants, and administrative staff are among the employees listed.

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *